Hydro One Networks Inc.
Current applications before the Board
Title: Hydro One Networks Inc. (EB-2024-0142) - Port Colborne Expropriation
Case number: EB-2024-0142
Type:
Filed: April 11, 2025
Hydro One Networks Inc. (Hydro One) is asking the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) for permission to expropriate interests in certain lands near the City of Port Colborne. Hydro One says that the expropriation is needed so that it may continue to operate and maintain existing transmission lines that are located on the lands. The existing transmission lines were originally constructed in the 1960s and form part of the Independent Electricity System Operator controlled transmission grid.
Hydro One’s application is about the expropriation of certain lands only. It is not about compensation. The OEB will consider the public interest when making any order authorizing Hydro One to expropriate land. The OEB does not have the authority to determine the amount of compensation payable. If the OEB authorizes Hydro One to expropriate and the parties do not agree upon compensation, then the compensation must be determined under the Expropriations Act by the Ontario Land Tribunal.
Type: Expropriation
This application will be heard using the LTC Complex electricity & Natural Gas performance standard (pdf).
Find out more about OEB Performance Standards for Processing Applications and use the Application Planning Tool to assist you with an estimate of the milestones in this proceeding.
See the application notice
See the application
See all documents related to this application
The above links will take you to our document repository
Participate
There are three ways to participate in the OEB hearing process: as an Intervenor, submitting a Letter of Comment or to Follow a Proceeding.
This table illustrates the different levels of participation. Find out more about participating in an OEB hearing, including becoming an intervenor.
| Participation Activities | Intervenor | Letter of Comment | Follow a Proceeding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Receive OEB-issued documents by email |  |  | |
| Submit a Letter of Comment | | | |
| Listen to live broadcast of the oral hearing | | | |
| Participate in oral hearing | | | |
| Present Evidence | | | |
| Respond to questions about evidence | | | |
| Ask other parties to the proceeding questions | | | |
| Provide argument | | | |
See application details and how to participate
Title: Hydro One Networks Inc. - Waasigan Expropriation
Case number: EB-2024-0319
Type:
Filed: January 09, 2025
Hydro One Networks Inc. (Hydro One) is asking the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) for permission to expropriate interests in certain lands between the Municipality of Shuniah and the Town of Atikokan in Ontario, to construct and operate a new 230 kilovolt double-circuit transmission line between Lakehead Transformer Station (TS) and Mackenzie TS (Project).
The Project comprises two phases. Phase 1 consists of constructing a new 230 kilovolt (kV) double-circuit transmission line that spans approximately 190 km to connect the existing Lakehead TS with the existing Mackenzie TS. Phase 2 consists of constructing a new 230 kV single-circuit transmission line spanning approximately 170 km from the existing Mackenzie TS to the existing Dryden TS. The anticipated in-service date for Phase 1 is December 2025, while Phase 2 is expected to be in-service by December 2027.
Under a separate Decision and Order dated April 16, 2024, the Ontario Energy Board granted Hydro One leave to construct and operate the Project.
Phase 1 of the Project will require Hydro One to acquire land rights from approximately 136 directly impacted property owners. Hydro One is not requesting permission to expropriate interests in lands related to Phase 2 at this time.
Hydro One’s application is about the expropriation of certain specific lands only. It is not about compensation. The OEB will consider the public interest when making any order authorizing Hydro One to expropriate land. The OEB does not have the authority to determine the amount of compensation payable. If the OEB authorizes Hydro One to expropriate and the parties do not agree upon compensation, then the compensation must be determined under the Expropriations Act or by the Ontario Land Tribunal.
Type: Expropriation
This application will be heard using the LTC Complex electricity & Natural Gas performance standard (pdf).
Find out more about OEB Performance Standards for Processing Applications and use the Application Planning Tool to assist you with an estimate of the milestones in this proceeding.
See the application notice
See the application
See all documents related to this application
The above links will take you to our document repository
Participate
There are three ways to participate in the OEB hearing process: as an Intervenor, submitting a Letter of Comment or to Follow a Proceeding.
This table illustrates the different levels of participation. Find out more about participating in an OEB hearing, including becoming an intervenor.
| Participation Activities | Intervenor | Letter of Comment | Follow a Proceeding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Receive OEB-issued documents by email | | | |
| Submit a Letter of Comment | | | |
| Listen to live broadcast of the oral hearing | | | |
| Participate in oral hearing | | | |
| Present Evidence | | | |
| Respond to questions about evidence | | | |
| Ask other parties to the proceeding questions | | | |
| Provide argument | | | |
See application details and how to participate
Contact this Utility:
7th Floor, South Tower
Toronto ON M5G 2P5
The electricity utility scorecards measure how well Ontario's electricity utilities are performing each year. It is designed to encourage utilities to operate effectively, continually seek ways to improve productivity and focus on improvements that their customers value. Utilities report their scorecard performance results annually, and make the results available to the public.
The scorecard can be used as a tool for consumers to assess for themselves the value of the service received from their electricity utility. For example:
- When service appointments are booked with my utility, how often did they show up on time?
- How often did my power go out, and how long did the utility take to fix the problem and restore power?
- How successful is my utility at issuing accurate bills?
- Did my utility answer phone calls from customers in a timely way?
Use our report generator tool to compare costs and performance between distributors
New residential/small business services connected on time 99.97% (2023)
The utility must connect new service for the customer within five business days, 90 % of the time, unless the customer agrees to a later date. This timeline depends on the customer meeting specific requirements ahead of time (such as no electrical safety concerns in the building, customer's payment information complete, etc.)
Scheduled appointments met on time 100% (2023)
For appointments during the utility's regular business hours, the utility must offer a window of time that is not more than four hours long, and must arrive within that window, 90 % of the time.
Telephone calls answered on time 78.24% (2023)
During regular call centre hours, the utility's call centre staff must answer within 30 seconds of receiving the call directly or having the call transferred to them, 65 % of the time
Billing accuracy 99.04% (2023)
An important part of business is ensuring that customer's bills are accurate. The utility must report on its success at issuing accurate bills to its customers.
More information about billing accuracy
More information about billing accuracy
Accurate bills issued expressed as a percentage of total bills issued. It is calculated as:
= (Total number of bills issued for the year – Number of inaccurate bills issued for the year) / Total number of bills issued for the year
This requirement must be met at least 98% of the time on a yearly basis.
Complaints 0.06 (2023)
This metric measures the number of complaints the Ontario Energy Board received from customers about matters within our authority. Complaints made directly to the utility are not reported here. We measure this per 1000 customers so utilities that serve much larger or smaller populations can be compared against each other.
| Year | Complaints per 1000 customers | Total number of complaints |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 0.53 | 647 |
| 2014 | 0.49 | 593 |
| 2015 | 0.34 | 425 |
| 2016 | 0.30 | 397 |
| 2017 | 0.10 | 127 |
| 2018 | 0.07 | 87 |
| 2019 | 0.07 | 99 |
| 2020 | 0.04 | 55 |
| 2021 | 0.05 | 77 |
| 2022 | 0.07 | 100 |
| 2023 | 0.06 | 85 |
Average number of hours power to a customer was interrupted 7.50421h (2023)
An important feature of a reliable distribution system is recovering from power outages as quickly as possible. The utility must track the average length of time, in hours, that its customers have experienced a power outage over the past year.
Average number of times power to a customer was interrupted 2.82113 (2023)
Another important feature of a reliable distribution system is reducing the frequency of power outages. Utilities must also track the number of times their customers experienced a power outage during the past year.
More information about interruption frequency
More information about interruption frequency
We measure disruption using the System Average Interruption Duration Index (Loss of Supply). It expresses the average amount of time, per reporting period, during which supply to a customer was interrupted. It is determined by dividing the total monthly duration of all interruptions experienced by all customers (excluding interruptions caused by Loss of Supply events), in hours, by the average number of customers served:
= (Total Customer Hours of Interruptions – Total Customer Hours of Interruptions caused by Loss of Supply events)/ Average Number of Customers Served.
Efficiency rating 4 (2023)
The utility must manage its costs successfully in order to help assure its customers they are receiving value for the cost of the service they receive. Utilities' total costs are evaluated to produce a single efficiency ranking. This is divided into five groups based on how big the difference is between each utility's actual and predicted costs. Distributors whose actual costs are lower than their predicted costs are considered more efficient.
- 1 = Actual costs are 25% or more below predicted costs
- 2 = Actual costs are 10% to 25% below predicted costs
- 3 = Actual costs are within +/- 10% of predicted costs
- 4 = Actual costs are 10% to 25% above predicted costs
- 5 = Actual costs are 25% or more above predicted costs
| 2013 | 5 |
| 2014 | 5 |
| 2015 | 5 |
| 2016 | 4 |
| 2017 | 4 |
| 2018 | 4 |
| 2019 | 4 |
| 2020 | 4 |
| 2021 | 4 |
| 2022 | 4 |
| 2023 | 4 |
Cost per customer $1,369 (2023)
A simple measure that can be used as a comparison with other utilities is the utility's total cost per customer.
Total cost is a sum of all the costs incurred by the utility to provide service to its customers. The amount is then divided by the utility's total number of customers. This amount does not represent how much customers pay for their utility services.
More information about Cost per Customer
More information about Cost per Customer
Total cost is calculated as the sum of a utility’s capital costs and Operating, Maintenance & Administration, or OM&A, costs, including certain adjustments to make the costs more comparable between utilities, per reporting period. This amount is then divided by the total number of customers the utility serves.
| 2013 | $1,046 |
| 2014 | $1,069 |
| 2015 | $983 |
| 2016 | $987 |
| 2017 | $974 |
| 2018 | $1,022 |
| 2019 | $1,051 |
| 2020 | $1,024 |
| 2021 | $1,033 |
| 2022 | $1,172 |
| 2023 | $1,369 |